Archive for the ‘Sales Skills’ Category

From the Buyer’s Perspective: Getting the “Best Deal”

January 20, 2012 by Scott Olsen

Have you ever thought you had a agreement, then ran into a negotiating buzz saw? You probably ran into a strategic purchasing professional or someone they trained. In this economy, more and more organizations are engaging strategic purchasing professionals to:

  1. help evaluate and recommend the best products and services to satisfy their needs
  2. ensure their clients pay as little as possible on each purchase
  3. minimize short and long term risks

Just like the sales person has incentives to hit revenue targets, strategic purchasing professionals are likely to have MBOs for cost savings with bonuses tied to them. How do they create these huge cost savings? Initially, by doing extensive research, cost benefit analysis and networking to determine which vendors they should talk with in the first place. Second, by being the best negotiator in the room. When negotiating, they leverage power where ever possible. Here are a few examples of the types of power they leverage:

  • Creativity
  • Vested Interest (the ability to get you to invest in them and their company)
  • Legal
  • Relationship
  • Endurance
  • Expertise

In addition to leveraging power, strategic purchasing professionals may use tactics to test their counterpart’s (the sales person’s) negotiation skills. Negotiation tactics are defined as games or tricks used to expose weaknesses within the sales person and his/her organization. For example, some of the most common tactics include:

  • competition
  • violins
  • intimidating language or tone of voice
  • foggy memory
  • ultimatum
  • inside information

Strategic purchasing professionals always do their homework. As a business to business salesperson you may walk away from the agreement with your commission and then you’re off to the next opportunity. The strategic purchasing professional has to live with your product for years. They never want to make a mistake.

My advise to business to business sales professionals. Take the time to become a skilled negotiator and prepare for each negotiation. The idea that anyone is a “natural negotiator” is a contradiction in terms. The skilled and prepared negotiator gets the best deals on average. Recently, a sales managers told me “I have a really good sales person, unfortunately he’s a poor negotiator. As a result of the discounts his customers get away with, he has to close twice as many deals as his colleagues.”

I recently interviewed a group of strategic purchasing professionals to get their opinion on two topics: what would they list as fatal flaws for a sales person and what’s a compelling approach a sales person can make to be more effective?

Fatal flaws included:

  1. arrogance
  2. poor presentations/demonstrations that aren’t tailored to the audience
  3. poor follow up
  4. trying to go around the strategic purchasing professional

What approach works with strategic purchasing professions? They need to believe, at the very least, they are paying no more than anyone else for your product or service. By letting the purchaser know that you need to be and are fair to the market you are serving by keeping pricing consistent for like products and service offerings you’re likely to have a smoother and productive negotiation.

→ No Comments
Categories: Differentiating You, Major Account Selling, Negotiation, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Tactical Selling Skills, Uncategorized

The Hostile Business to Business Sales Person

January 11, 2012 by Scott Olsen

You may not want your friends to demonstrate hostile behavior, but professionals who are hostile by nature are more likely to succeed in business sales and high level leadership in the long run than those without it.

Why?

…because their hostile nature tends to fuel their fire day in and day out. So what does this mean to possess a hostile behavior trait? Here’s an example, if the hostile person were to leave their wallet at a restaurant, when they get home and realize this, their likely first thought would be, “I left my wallet at the restaurant. Someone has stole it and spent all of the money. I need to cancel my credit cards immediately.” The opposite of the hostile person in this sense is the tolerant person. If the tolerant person leaves their wallet at a restaurant, when they get home they might think something like, “I left my wallet at the restuarant. I’m sure someone turned it in for me. I’ll just call up the restaurant, ask them to hold it for me and when I swing by tomorrow to pick it up, I might make a best new friend in the process.” This may be an exaggeration, but the point is the tolerant person has a buoyant view of the world, “it’s all going to work out.” On the other hand the hostile person has a view that “the world is a nasty place. It’s a jungle out there. If I don’t get up and fight my way through it everyday, it will eat me up alive.” The hostile person is more likely to wake up each day with a fire in their belling thinking, “what do I have to do today to make something good happen.”

Harness the Hostility

Given the choice between the aggressive sales person and the passive sales person for their team of “hunters,” sales managers know they need the aggressive ones to really make things happen in opening up new territories. The sales manager knows there ’s a risk associated with the hostile sales person, but it’s well worth it if sales person can harness this trait. Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson’s new book, The Challenger Sale, describes the most effective sales people as assertive, not aggressive, but assertive. Dixon and Adamson go on to compare the assertive and aggressive sales person in the following ways:

Assertive

  • Directly pursues goals in a constructive way
  • Defends own personal boundaries
  • Uses direct language

Aggressive

  • Pursues goals at the expense of  professionalism
  • Attacks others’ personal boundaries
  • Uses antagonistic language

In summary, the hostile trait tends to fuel the fire of the business sales person and high level leader, but it’s only when they transmute this behavior from aggressiveness to assertiveness that they become most effective. For those who want to become more assertive and deal better with aggressive counterparts, I suggest participating in our Effective Negotiation Skills course.

→ No Comments
Categories: Differentiating You, Executive Selling, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Selling in Difficult Times, Uncategorized, professional development, selling

When Buyer’s Use Negotiation Tactics

January 10, 2012 by Scott Olsen

How many times have your heard a customer sing the sad song of an “erratic economy” or “unstable financial times” as a way to get deep discounts. This tactic, or negotiation trick, is known as “violins.” While some companies are experiencing very trying times, this isn’t true of all corporations. Borrowing from Charles Dickens, I’d say it’s been the best of times for some corporations and the worst of times for others. Even the companies who are experiencing the “best of times” are using “violins” to get amazing prices. These “well off” companies have told me, “just because we’re not suffering financially does’t mean we shouldn’t be able to get in on the great deals.” The best sales professionals have learned to approach the negotiation process as a game.

So, how does the effective sales person deal with buyer tactics and avoid becoming a victim? The first step is recognizing a tactic. A negotiation tactic can come in many forms and by definition is a gambit or probe used by the buyer to expose and/or weaken the sales person’s position. The important thing to remember is that negotiation tactics are not demands, they are bluffs made up by a buyer to get “unreasonable” deals from the seller.

Once you’ve recognized the tactic, the best way to deal with the tactic is to neutralize it by countering the buyer’s tactic with a seller tactic. It may seem counterintuitive to some, but it is essential that the buyer understands that the sales person is on to the buyer’s games and that the sales person can play this win/lose game too, and perhaps even better. Once the buyer believes he or she can’t beat you at this type of  ”game” you may have a chance to raise the negotiation from the win/lose level to the balanced level. The balanced level deals with real demands and is typified by “quid pro quo.”

Some of the most common tactics I see are “competition,” “hoops” and the “fritz.” And let’s not forgot the all time classic, “your price is too high.” As the name implies, “competition” is when a buyer says something like, “I may have to look and see if your competition is willing to meet my needs.”

Hoops

You might be experiencing “hoops” if a customer asks you to do a series of worthless tasks without a clear end in sight.

Although “hoops” may be one of the most frustrating tactics to get caught up in, it can also be one of the easiest tactics to counter, by asking the customer, “if I fulfill your request, do we have a deal?”

Fritz

The “fritz” tactic can be the most intimidating to experience and usually comes across as loud and abrasive language in response to something you’ve said, usually immediately after you’ve shared your price.

In summary, the first step in dealing with buyer tactics is awareness. The second step is to neutralize the buyer’s tactic by countering or exposing their tactics. For example, if a customer uses “fritz” on you, you may counter with your own “fritz” or any other tactic. Any tactic can counter a tactic.

Balanced Agreements

Warning! When you engage in win/lose negotiation, typified by either or both sides using tactics, there is always a chance your negotiation could end is lose/lose. If you are adept at countering or exposing tactics, you may be able to raise the level of negotiation to balanced or possibly win/win.

Buyer’s negotiation tactics are not demands, they are games. Tactics are designed to fool or trick you into caving and lowering your price. A customer demand, by definition, is a deal maker or deal breaker. The wise sales person can tell the difference. When a customer makes a demand, you are in prime position to make own your demand of equal or greater value. Recently, one of my clients experienced a negotiation that went like this… The seller requested 50% payment up front and 50% upon delivery of services, with payment terms of net 10 days. The buyer stated that their policy is to pay in net 30 days. In response, the seller said he could go along with the “net 30″ if the buyer allowed the seller to submit the invoice at 100% immediately. The buyer agreed. In the end, the seller was delayed the initial 1/2 payment up front, but received the full payment earlier than originally expected.

→ No Comments
Categories: Creating Ideal Customers, Executive Selling, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Sales Stories, Selling in Difficult Times, Tactical Selling Skills, Uncategorized, negotiation skills, professional development

How Would Peter Drucker Sell?

January 7, 2012 by Scott Olsen

When I review a sales team’s questioning guide, I typically find thoughtful questions. However, the questions are often in no coherent order. Or at least no natural order that would help the customer feel comfortable and confident to open up and engage in a truly productive and insightful conversation.

My main goal with any customer conversation is to add value to the customer’s thinking and decision making while uncovering and satisfying their critical success factors. When we ask good questions, we have a much better chance of getting good answers (no guarantee, it’s still sales). Furthermore, when we ask good questions in an optimal flow, we have an even better chance of getting really good answers.

The SPIN® Selling model provides one way of organizing your questions. Personally, I prefer an approach that helps me uncover BINGO information. Uncovering BINGO Information offers a slight, but important twist to the SPIN® Selling model. Here’s a brief overview:

  • Background
  • Issues/Impact
  • Need/Benefit
  • GO for the close

I was once told that Peter Drucker (1909-2005) said every business should be asking themselves two questions. The first is “what are we doing?” and the second is “what should we be doing?” Background questions are similar to “what are we doing?” Background questions deal with the general facts, goals, vision and what is working in your customer’s world. Furthermore, background questions help you warm up the conversation and are always safe, neutral or positive in nature. Issue questions are similar to Drucker’s second question, “what should we be doing?” Issue questions are far more interesting as they help uncover the difference (or gap) between what the customer is doing today verses what the customer could be doing. However, issues alone are rarely, if ever enough to propel a customer to take action. This is why we need to follow issue questions with powerful impact question. The purpose of the impact question is to help quantify the cost of not resolving the issue.

For example, the fact that a customer uses a paper process when they could be using an automated process is an issue. The impact is the quantification of what this issue is or might be costing the customer. How much extra time does it take? How much does this extra time cost? What else could they be doing with that extra time? It’s a domino effect and top sales professionals are skilled and helping the customer realize or visualize these impacts.

Once you’ve confirmed the issue is worth resolving, by asking impact questions, it is time to make the need explicit and ask the customer how they would benefit from the capabilities your solutions provide. Continuing with our example above, you might say something like, “It sounds like you need a streamlined process. How would it help if you and your colleagues could capture all of your requirements in one place and receive real time alerts to any update to your projects?” With a good benefit question, the customer herself creates the value statement. With the customer’s positive response, it’s time to go for the close or the logical next step in your sales process.

When you ask questions in the optimal flow, you ask questions in a way that naturally flows in the same way your customers make decisions. Ultimately, you put yourself in a position to close by providing the customer with the exact solution they’ve confirmed they need and desire.

→ No Comments
Categories: Creating Ideal Customers, Engaging Your Customers, Questioning Skills, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Selling Process, Tactical Selling Skills, Trust and Credibility, Uncategorized

Know When to Walk Away from the Sale

January 6, 2012 by Scott Olsen

As a sales person, how hard is it to walk away from a deal?

You’ve worked hard to get as close as possible, but in your heart you know the customer is not a good fit, is unlikely to be a good referral and will probably take an inordinate amount of time along the way. The wise sales organization and sales person knows when to cut their losses and move on to better opportunities.

What steps can you take to improve you ability to better qualify and sell more efficiently? First, define your ideal customer. What do they look like? What are identifiable characteristics you can learn in advance or can quickly uncover through effective questioning. Your list may include topics like:

  • culture
  • current processes
  • other products they use today
  • geography
  • industry
  • competitors
  • employee count
  • revenue
  • profit
  • type of organization (i.e. public, private or government)
  • types of products they sell (ie. software, hardware, professional services, etc.)
  • other (i.e. they love what makes your solution unique)

After you’ve defined your ideal customer, begin to rank your customer’s on a scale of 1-10, “10″ being ideal. As a result, you’ll purposely spend more time with your ideal customers, help some customer’s become or behave more like ideal customers and minimize time with customers who drain your time, energy and resources. In the end you’ll win.

→ No Comments
Categories: Creating Ideal Customers, Executive Selling, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Tactical Selling Skills, Uncategorized, selling

Just the Right Amount of Customer Contact

May 13, 2010 by Scott Olsen

I’m often asked about the best ways to follow up with prospects and customers. I find most sales people are concerned about following up too much and coming across as aggressive, while sales managers have a fear that their sales people may be too passive and not following up quick enough or on a consistent basis.

Based on a McKinsey Quarterly article, The basics of business-to-business sales success, there is good reason to pay attention to how you do follow up. This article is based on a study that shows the “most destructive” sales activity in the eyes of the decision maker is “too much contact (in person, by phone, or via email)”.

I’ve found the best way to ensure the appropriate amount/timing of follow up is to take the guess work out by asking the prospect. At the end of each conversation, agree together how you can best track with and support the customer’s decision making process and when you should talk next. This simple idea saves sales people a tremendous amount of wondering, grief and head ache as to when to follow up. Some of my clients have tripled their weekly productivity by becoming better at closing each phone call with an agreed upon clear next action step with their customer.

“When” you follow up is important, but perhaps the bigger question is, “are you adding value every time you make contact with your prospect or customer?” Here are some simple common sense ways that may help ensure your conversations are relevant and meaningful to your prospect:

  1. be brief and to the point
  2. open with a quick summary of relevant info from your previous conversation
  3. confirm/establish the objectives, then the agenda of the meeting
  4. summarize the key take aways from the conversation
  5. confirm next action steps and who is responsible for what, including the date/time/objectives of the next conversation

Running effective meetings or facilitating effective conversations is more science than art. One of my clients, an SVP of a very large technology company, shared with me that the most valuable training he had ever participated in was a week long course on how to run effective meetings.

Please share your approach to ensuring the right timing and ways you facilitate relevant and meaningful conversations with your prospects and customers.

→ No Comments
Categories: Closing Skills, Engaging Your Customers, Executive Selling, Major Account Selling, Prospecting, Sales Management, Sales Skills, Tactical Selling Skills, Uncategorized, sell, selling

The Oldest Negotiation Tactic in the Book

January 22, 2010 by Scott Olsen

My client met with a prospect who was interested in consulting services to help streamline product development cycles. During the visit, the President said, “we could really use your help, but we don’t have a budget for this, give us your best pricing and we’ll see what we can do.” Not having budget and not having resources to pay for services are two different things. Listen closely to your prospects and customers, but don’t let negotiation tactics get you down. When it’s time to present your proposal, make sure you share with your prospect you listened and understood his/her concerns about expenses. Point out specifically how you’ve taken his/her comments into consideration into your proposal to make sure you can meet the confirmed needs and budget requirements.

→ No Comments
Categories: Negotiation, Prospecting, Sales Skills, Sales Stories, Trust and Credibility

Selling is a Profession

June 29, 2009 by Scott Olsen

Selling is a profession. Therefore the skills involved in this profession can be identified, learned, reinforced and improved. To become successful and stay competitive, sales professional must utilize the right approach at the right time with the right customer and present the right product. In the present competitive environment nobody sells alone. Understanding how to utilize internal company resources and various teams to achieve desired results certainly must be considered a significant priority in the overall generation of revenue and profits . Additionally, each selling organization has unique training requirements that cannot be satisfied in total by standardized shelf courses.

To generate the most repeat sales in a competitive marketplace, leading organizations take a customized approach to sales skills that begins where sales professionals need assistance, builds on strengths, always reinforces previous training, establishes habits of successful selling and generates more business again and again. Sales training becomes a process not a series of discontinuous events.

→ No Comments
Categories: Major Account Selling, Presentation Skills, Sales Skills, Sales Training, Selling Strategies

Selling in Difficult Times

April 17, 2009 by Scott Olsen

A good friend of mine shared a short story with me about a software sales person who told his boss,  “I can’t sell anything… half the country is unemployed!” The boss replied, “Then sell the other half.” I love that story!

Based on first hand experiences and the situations I help my clients deal with, these are very difficult economics times with countless examples of empowered CFO’s scrutinizing every current decision as well as reviewing any past decisions to explore ways to unwind or minimize their expenses. In the big picture, economies go up and down, trends come a go, but solutions to problems never go out of style.

Are you selling products or solving problems?

-Scott Olsen

→ No Comments
Categories: Sales Skills, Sales Stories

Don’t Give Up!

March 18, 2009 by gviggiano

You have a solid sales process that used to produce lots of money per sales rep, but now is producing next to nothing. What went wrong?
The answer is that the clients started answering your questions with vague answers.  When the person asked for clarification, the client would stall the sales rep with things like we have a few things to check, budget, time lines, etc. The truth: they just were too scared to be honest with us!
Salespeople are numb to the fact that people are not buying.  When you make your follow up calls, they tell you that it’s tied up in budget…but to check back again.  So you wait to follow up, with answers to their questions, but you get stalled again. It’s not until you dig further that you are made aware of the true problem: they aren’t buying and have no idea when that will change.  So as any good salesperson, you dive into your list and start the process again. But the changes are apparent at all companies…there just not telling you!

So we present our sales leaders with some difficult choices. What do we do? Do we just give up? Offer them free terms?

You just need to ask tougher questions. Instead of asking questions about budget, ask questions about their intent to buy. Do you intend to buy this? What will cause this situation to change? Why are they looking to make a change? Where else are they looking? If they have to decide today, will we win or lose? Why? Is anything going on in the company that we need to know about? If you get the answers to these questions, at least you’ll know the status of the deals and now your pipeline becomes real.

Just try it today and let me know if it works.

→ 4 Comments
Categories: Executive Selling, Major Account Selling, Questioning Skills, Sales Skills, Sales Stories, Tactical Selling Skills